1150-1499 is the period we can expect to change most significantly in the new version of OED. For reasons outlined in our page on the medieval portion of their period coverage, the original OED lexicographers, working with very restricted access to texts from this earlier stage of the language, were simply unable to do justice to Middle English. Now, however, the revisers at work on OED3 are able to draw on a wide range of subsequently published texts and scholarship, together with the resources of the Toronto Old English Dictionary project (ongoing), the Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue (compiled 1937-2002), and, especially, the Michigan Middle English Dictionary (compiled 1952-2001). The last two projects covered vast amounts of material untapped by the first edition of OED (all three were projected by W. A. Craigie, one of the original OED lexicographers, in 1919: see Craigie 1919).

As the Deputy-Editor of OED3, Edmund Weiner, wrote in 2000, 'no extensive reading programme [for the current revision of OED] has been undertaken for Middle English, though certain newly available texts are being read,' since 'in this sphere the OED has to bow to the primacy of the MED, and, to a more limited extent, the DOST,' who have between them 'already assembled the overwhelming majority of the available lexical evidence. The main effort of the OED project is concentrated on a painstaking comparison between the coverage of each word in these two dictionaries and the corresponding entries in the OED' (Weiner 2000a: 170; he later refers to this as a policy of 'limited but targeted data collection' (p. 172). On the 'inter-indebtedness' of historical dictionaries, see further Simpson 2004a).

What are the results so far? To get a broad picture of the changes which the current revision of OED has introduced into the quotation record, we need to isolate the portion of the alphabet range so far revised, and compare the number of quotations in OED2 and OED3 for this stretch of the alphabet only.

As of December 2005, the new revision, which started at the letter 'M' in 2000, had got mid-way through the letter 'P', up to the word 'philandering'. The table below compares the number of quotations in OED2 and OED3 over the alphabet range M-philandering:

OED2 and OED3 quotations per decade 1150-1499 (M-philandering)



These results need further investigation, but it is clear that the OED3 revisers have concentrated their efforts so far on the later medieval period (1400-1499). This may more easily be seen in our second table below and is probably to be explained by their heavy reliance on the MED's documentation:

OED2 and OED3 quotations per century 1150-1499 (M-philandering)



The raw figures for total quotations M-philandering over the period 1150-1499 are 26,086 for OED2, and 37,291 for OED3, making a notable (43%) increase of 11,205 quotations overall.

There have also been some major shifts in dating. As observed in our page on Initial results: 1150-1499, the small number of texts available for this period when the first OED was compiled, plus the difficulty of dating them accurately, led to bunchings of quotations at 'round number' dates (e.g. 1200 and 1300). Now that further scholarship on major sources such as the works of the Gawain-poet has resulted in re-dating, large numbers of quotations in OED2, though retained in OED3, occupy a different place in OED on our graph.

Thus three of the works of the Gawain-poet, viz. Pearl, Patience, and Cleanness, were quoted from Richard Morris's edition of 1864 (the first volume in the Early English Text Society created partly in order to provide printed quotation material from hitherto unpublished medieval sources for OED), under the title Early English Alliterative Poems (abbreviated 'E.E. Allit. P.'). They were dated 'c1325' in OED1. Now, in OED3 (i.e. over the alphabet range so far revised), they are identified by individual title (Pearl, Patience, Cleanness) and dated 'c1400 (?c1380)'.